CRASHING INTO FIRST CLASS: LAW SCHOOL EDITION – PART 2
STUDYING FOR THE BAR FINALS
We've
looked at some of the basics for any student navigating or about to navigate
the Nigerian Law School. Now, let's get into studying for the bar finals as a
student hoping to emerge with the best possible result, a first class.
I'd
like to begin with a disclaimer. I am going to try to be as neutral as
possible, and will not point to any particular study method as some sort of
fail-proof strategy to excel at the bar finals. However, I am going to focus on
tips that I believe would enhance and optimise whatever reading strategy you
decide to take, as well as lead you in the right direction if needed.
Furthermore,
reading is just one part of the puzzle. It is possible to read harder than
everyone else and still not perform as well as you might desire. This is
because, no matter how many hours you spend reading, your conduct during the
exam week and how careful you are to avoid mistakes, as well as the grace that
you have to avoid any unfortunate circumstances, really are the deal breakers
when it comes to making your desired grades.
Anyways,
let's begin, shall we?
MAKING NOTES
The
need to make notes at the Nigerian law school is a very controversial topic,
even amongst first-class students. Several students are of the point of view
that to excel in your bar finals, you have to make detailed notes. Others
believe that making notes is a complete waste of time and that the time spent
making notes could be spent actually reading.
On
this, I am on the fence. I did make notes in law school; detailed typed notes
that I have shared with some of the students currently in law school. I also,
for about 10 out of the 17 topics across board, made written mind maps of my
typed notes (until I ran out of time to continue with them). I made the notes
because I am way too much of a scatter-brain to have to rely on multiple
sources of information. I preferred having an organised material that contained
all the information that I needed, so I made my organised materials.
However,
as I mentioned in my previous blog post, making notes is not actually reading.
In fact, once you pass the 100 days mark to bar finals, I believe that you have
no business with making notes any longer. Making notes in and of itself does
not amount to much in terms of retention. You forget about 80% of what you have
written in your notes just a few days or even hours after making them. This is
because making notes, especially the way most people go about it, is mostly
passive reading. I believed it to be, in my case, a necessary evil because of
the kind of person I was. If I could, I would not have made notes at the
Nigerian Law School. But I did, and I do not regret doing so; I would be lying
if I said that there weren't times at NLS when I felt that making notes had me
a little behind my peers, especially because they were reading faster than I
was at some point.
Nevertheless,
note-making can be productive, especially when you are not just brainlessly
rewriting chunks of text from a textbook, a statute or class slides. When you
use note making as a means of breaking concepts down in a way that you can
understand, processing the information and rephrasing it in a way that makes
subsequent reading easier and more palatable, creating patterns that make
things easier for you to remember (I did this a lot with sections of law), or
creating summaries that would help subsequent reading become faster and easier,
it is very productive. But as you can see, even in this productivity, it all
tilts to helping you when you actually start reading and reviewing your notes.
For
me, even while I felt that making notes originally had me a little behind my
peers in my pace of reading, I am not going to lie, the benefits later on made
it all worth it, especially after I converted my typed notes into flashcards.
Those flashcards were so useful when it came to my active recall, and they made
retrieving information so much easier. Again, when I started using NotebookLM,
I fed my typed notes to the AI system, and they were the basis for the
discussions, the practice tests and other things that I used the AI tool for.
However,
I never fell into the trap of having a false sense of completeness and
believing that because I had thorough notes, that meant that I had learned what
I had written down. As I said, making notes was a necessary evil for me during
the first part of law school because they made the latter part of law school a
bit easier. Notes are only the starting material in terms of reading. You'll
actually eventually have to read the notes. And you do not want to have spent
so much time making notes that you are then choked for time when it comes to
the real deal, i.e., reading what you have written.
The
simple point I'm trying to drive is that when it comes to making notes, there
is no hard and fast rule. Some people make notes and excel; some people don't
and still excel. I usually recommend making notes but doing so as quickly as
you can so that you can get to actually reading. But in the end, the key is
finding what best suits you and following through with it.
PASSIVE VS ACTIVE STUDY
When
it comes to reading methods, I generally hold no reservations on whichever one
a person chooses to use. However, I do strongly oppose any reading method that
involves more passive study than active study. Why? Because that's
self-sabotage. You're setting yourself up for failure, and if you're not
careful, you won't realise it until it is too late.
Let
me begin by explaining what these two terms mean. Passive study is simply
consuming information without retention. It is the study equivalent of comfort
food. It's easy. It feels productive. It feels like you are doing something.
Your hands are flying through your notes, filling the pages with words. You're
listening to a class recording. Your highlighter is breezing through the
textbook. You're mindlessly rereading notes. It's the kind of study that you do
when you're lying on your bed, flipping through a textbook like it's a novel.
You feel like you're understanding what you are reading, and you believe that
it translates to retention. But it doesn't. Most times, it just results in
familiarity with the concept, meaning that if you come across it again, you are
able to recognise that you have come across the concept before. But that
doesn't translate to actually being able to remember what you have read.
On
the other hand, active study is actively trying to produce knowledge. It's
actively pushing your memory to retrieve information or to apply the
information to any situation (like exam questions). It involves explaining
concepts aloud without using notes, using flashcards to quiz yourself, practice
testing, teaching the material to someone else, writing about a concept from
memory, etc.
Active
study is generally a very uncomfortable method of reading, especially at the
beginning. It can be frustrating. It requires real mental work and often
produces the uncomfortable feeling of failure when you have difficulty with
recollection. Because of this, people tend to procrastinate or run away from
active reading.
When
I was in my 100 level, I read a lot of books about studying and came across
several research works regarding these methods of study. I also came across
different psychological strategies for effective study, like the Feynman
technique, but I'm not going to bore you with psychology. I'm just going to go
straight into the facts. I've never experienced a complete blackout in any
exam. I also have never had to reread several times before an exam. In fact,
when I tell people that I read certain topics 5 times or so in NLS, they assume
that I actually reread my notes (in the regular way) over and over again. Nope.
Not at all. I just encountered the topics in different ways up to 5 times
before exams. In fact, I abandoned my notes about three weeks before exams,
relying only on my flash cards.
Now,
I do not claim to be the best guru in reading. But I do know the research,
which, I must admit, some others already figured out on their own without
having to be a self-help bore like myself. Did I apply all of them in law
school? Nope, unfortunately not. I never managed to find a way to go about
conquering the forgetting curve, and it bugged me a lot while in NLS. I didn't
use the Pomodoro technique, which, if you've read my university post, you would
know that I used a lot in my 100 to 200 level in the university. I didn't track
my reading hours because what was there to track? I was always either reading
or recovering from reading, so it was pointless.
My
point is, my reading method in law school wasn't really the best out there. In
fact, if I were to go back to NLS, there are a few things that I would have
amended, even though I would have maintained the same pattern. But when it came
to active reading, I was not lazy about it at all and spent a lot of time
honing down on what I knew worked best for me. Because of that, I do believe my
reading strategy in NLS was pretty solid and decent.
What
was my reading strategy, you may ask? Well, I made typed notes. That took a LOT
of time. I proceeded to make written summaries in a unique way (I used mind
maps to break down complex topics into small parts). The mind maps were
originally an experiment, but I stuck to them because they were fun and
colourful and they made reading easier and concepts easier to remember.
At
this point, I had already started a bit of active reading because to make mind
maps, you have to process the information and break down concepts into formats
conducive for a mind map. Also, I made those mind maps using the 'read, try to
understand, then proceed to replicate what you remember without looking at the
source material' method.
After
that, I proceeded to make my Anki cards, which involved asking myself questions
out of each chunk of information on my typed notes during my second reading
process. Once I made my cards out of my first set of topics, I began going
through them immediately. I made the mind maps during court externship, and I
couldn't actively make them in court (they needed quite a bit of material), so
instead, during times in court where I felt that I had gotten enough cases to
fill my logbook, I would lower my head and go through the questions on my cards,
quizzing myself over and over again. I also looked through the cards on the
bus, keke, and just generally any single time I had some time to spare. The
good thing about looking at the cards was that it really just involved pressing
my phone, so it was very convenient for all sorts of free time. Again, I was
actively engaging my brain, so I couldn't zone off while using the cards.
Of
course, if I were to change one thing, I would have begun the card-making
process before the court externship, because I believe that I would have gained
a deeper mastery of its contents. I would have also fully utilised its spaced
repetition pattern of asking questions, as the same was optimised to conquer
the forgetting curve. Also, if I had really understood how effective the cards
would be, I would not have even bothered with the mind maps (which I stopped
after about 10 weeks because I felt like I needed to pour more energy into a
more active form of learning).
My
reading was predominantly focused on looking through the mind maps at first,
and just flipping through the cards during free hours during the day (like
breaks, when I was eating, when I was too tired to sit up and read, when I was
waiting in line for food or some bureaucratic process) but about one month to
exams, when I had gone through all the mind maps and my printed notes, I
switched predominantly to the cards, going through and attempting to answer all
questions while flagging all that were difficult to answer.
I
also began reading with a friend about a month before exams, and we went
through a PDF that had extracted all the focus points of NLS past questions. I
was a tutor as well, so I also learned by actively teaching people during
tutorials. And that was my reading method up until exam week.
I
should also mention that a few weeks to exams, someone sent me a drive link
containing drafts that had been converted to songs, and although I had already
learnt most of the drafts at that point, they helped with 2 drafts in
particular, both of which came out in exams. I only answered one, and it was
really fun humming the song as I wrote down the draft in the exam hall (I still
remember the song, by the way).
For
my MCQs, I went through MCQs for the topics we were taught that week on
Saturdays, using a pen and paper. I maintained the pen and paper method of
answering the MCQs up until during chambers externship, when I replaced them
with OMR sheets that I had printed out. I also actively participated in Law
School Paddi MCQ battles every Saturday. When it was close to exams, I switched
back to pen and paper because I wanted to make some jottings as I practised
MCQs. I proceeded to revise all the weekly MCQs from the two different
materials that I had gotten in a long note exercise book. That book eventually
formed the bulk of what I revised the night before MCQs.
Remember,
I am just telling my story. I am sure many other first-class students used
different and even less flowery strategies. This is not a template as to how
you must read to get a first class. I am just highlighting the fact that I read
mostly by quizzing myself, and my written note-making was not just a mindless
verbatim copying of material. I had to process information to both make the
mind maps and the cards, and reading them (especially the cards) involved the
difficult and often frustrating process of active recall.
No
matter what pattern of reading that you engage in, active recall should take
the main frame once you are done with getting an understanding of the topic.
Remember that if you understand a concept, but have not stored it in your
long-term memory before exams, your understanding is not going to be of any
assistance at all. Passive reading might be low-effort, but actually getting
things to stick using passive reading is very ineffective and time-consuming as
well.
If I
were to draft a reading method for law school, however you might want to go
about it, here is what I would recommend:
- Make
notes if needed and use that opportunity to gain understanding of the
topic (try as much as possible to process the information as you read it
and don't mindlessly copy verbatim from your textbooks, slides or
materials).
- For
the first phase reading afterwards, read your notes actively, with full
attention.
- Close
everything and retrieve what you've read from time to time during your
first phase reading. Write, speak, or sketch everything you remember. This
is the commencement of the desirable difficulty that comes with active
reading. But don't shy away from it. Lean into the discomfort.
- Compare
what you have said or written against the source. Note exactly what you
missed, as the act of making mistakes and getting corrected is the whole
point of active recall.
- Revisit
the same material 1 day, 3 days, and 7–10 days later using the same active
recall or retrieval method, not rereading. Doing this will prevent the
common pitfall of forgetting topics that you've spent so much time reading
before. This is one step I wish I had focused on more.
- After
some time, try to mix topics rather than looking at concepts of the same
type together. (This is where the cards really stood out to me, because
after the first flip, the concepts were scattered based on levels of
difficulty for me. I found this particularly useful in learning my RPC
because after some time, I began to be quizzed randomly — for example, I
might be asked on Rule 15(4) in a question, and the next question brings
up Rule 36. Being able to remember random sections at a go helped me to
actually gain mastery of the rules.)
- Explain
the topics to someone (real or imagined). You can give pretend lectures
and make them fun and interesting. Remember that the more unique,
interesting and engaging your reading sessions are, the more likely you
are to remember what you read.
- Of
course, do not forget to look at past questions and MCQs.
PAST QUESTIONS AND MCQS
One
very common pattern of active recall that all Nigerian Law School students have
to engage in is reading past questions and MCQs. You cannot enter the exam hall
without any knowledge of how the questions you are about to encounter would
possibly look like. Most NLS students, at some point or the other, realise
this, but some unfortunately find out a bit too late.
I
advise that you get into past questions and MCQs as quickly as you can. You can
start from your very first week by finding materials that arrange the MCQs and
past questions according to the topics. An app I used, Law School Paddi, had
some of the MCQs arranged per topic, but I also used about two more
comprehensive materials that did the same. If you do not find similar materials
for past questions, you can do as I did and manually search for the said
questions yourself.
Also,
don't just read the questions, then read the answers passively. Use the past
questions to train your active recall, speed and accuracy. Answer the questions
blindly without looking at any material, and then later, you can search for the
answers to ascertain your accuracy. However, I would advise that you be very
careful about the answers provided in some of the past questions that you might
encounter. Many of the easily and widely accessible ones do not contain the
official marking schemes and, as a result, can contain several errors that you
might take to be the correct answers if you are not careful. If you are
confused about an answer provided in any past question material, do not just
take it in hook, line and sinker, but check your source materials or ask
seniors or lecturers or your mates about the answer to the question.
Additionally,
as much as you can, practise the past questions under timed conditions. You are
given one hour to answer a hundred questions on the MCQ paper and three hours
to answer four theory questions. I would advise that you practice the MCQs and
past questions so much that you can answer the questions well below the time
that is given for same. For MCQs, I suggest that you train yourself to be able
to answer the 100 questions within 30 to 40 minutes and for theory, you should
train to be able to answer the four questions within two hours.
This
is because at the point of practising, you are not under exam tension, so you
tend to be less cautious about the answers you give. Therefore, when you
practise, you are much freer, and that means that you would tend to answer the
questions faster than how you would answer in the exam hall. For instance, I
trained myself to answer MCQs within 30 minutes, but in the exam hall, I
finished within 45 minutes. For theory, I trained to be able to answer a
question in 30 minutes and in exams, I didn't have so much time to revise, but
I never submitted an unfinished work.
I
strongly advise going through as many past questions as you can. At this
moment, you can access the ones from all the way back to 2009; that's almost 20
years of questions. I assure you that if you look through all of them, with the
consistent pattern of repeating questions in NLS, you would encounter a lot of
question formats that would not confuse you in the exam because you have already
seen patterns of questions like them and tackled the questions. Answering as
many past questions and MCQs as you can in NLS is a major hack to getting a
first class.
MENTORSHIP
Alongside
your reading strategy, mentorship makes a real difference. I honestly do not
know how a person can go through the Nigerian Law School without some form of
mentorship, whether direct or indirect. The NLS presents such a unique and
difficult situation that it helps a lot to have people who have done it before
give you guidance on how it can be done.
During
my time, I had a lot of mentors. I called, chatted and discussed with a lot of
people who had passed through the Nigerian Law School and gotten the grades
that I desired. Also, I was a facilitator in the Red Scroll Group, which was a
group where those of us at NLS reviewed past questions every night and had
mentors correct and advise us.
For
those who do not know any seniors to talk to, the good thing is that, just like
this post, there are a lot of write-ups and videos out there on how to excel at
the Nigerian Law School. Also, during your stay, there will be a lot of
webinars where your seniors can address you and give you tips to excel at NLS.
Find every possible means to look for them and get the necessary information
that you need so that you don't make costly mistakes that could have been
avoided had you just asked the right questions.
USE OF ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE
Beyond
mentorship from people, it's worth talking about mentorship of a different
kind: AI tools. I am a very big advocate of avoiding suffering as much as you
can and always finding easier ways to get around things. There is really no
reward at all for suffering, and the amount of time and difficulty it took you
to understand concepts is not only irrelevant in terms of the grades that will
be allocated to you, but also incredibly time-consuming.
Therefore,
I recommend the WISE use of Artificial Intelligence in law school. AI can help
break down concepts and sections that might be difficult to understand and help
you understand them faster. However, I believe that for AI systems like
ChatGPT, that is as much as its use should go. You cannot use ChatGPT to answer
past questions or pre-class tasks. ChatGPT and most, if not all, other AI
systems do not have sufficient knowledge of both Nigerian law and the NLS
standard of answering questions. They will feed you rubbish if you attempt to
use them that way.
In
NLS, ChatGPT was particularly helpful in helping me understand complex sections
of CAMA and other regulations. However, I found that the most versatile tool
was NotebookLM. Using that AI system, I could upload my typed notes, create
engaging podcast sessions, MCQs, summaries, digital mind maps, extract cases
and sections, etc. NotebookLM was also less likely to hallucinate when I asked
it questions because the answers were based on my notes.
Now,
I do not know if that is the only possible use of NotebookLM. I am certain that
you can use the system for many other things. But I found out about it a bit
too late to really explore all its potential. However, I do advise that you use
the tool and all other possible tools out there to make your reading faster and
more efficient.
YOUR READING ENVIRONMENT
In
NLS, I read everywhere: in cars, buses, kekes, walking down the road, at
restaurants, etc. My reading was on a 'once I have time to' basis, and I did
not necessarily have to create a perfect environment to read. There were times
I read in a very noisy class. I read outside of my corridor, in the middle of
my room, in the laundry room of my campus, in the reading rooms, in the common
rooms, while court was in session, etc.
When
it comes to a physical environment for reading, I do not advise being the sort
of person who can only read in specific places. In my court externship, I
encountered people who did not bother to open their books all through the court
session (and my court used to close very late), because they were convinced
they simply could not read in such an environment. I personally also do not
prefer having to crouch down in the middle of court proceedings to read or read
in the other inconvenient places that I have mentioned, but I was desperately
fighting for time so my preferences really did not matter when it came to my
reading environment.
However,
when I could, I liked to make my reading corner comfortable. I preferred a big
space to contain everything I needed, and as a result, I found pairing the
sofas in the common room with my bed table was my preferred choice of reading
space. However, there were times when I would feel the need to stay awake for
long stretches of time and felt that the sofas were too comfortable for that.
So I would head to the laundry room of the campus and sit in a very
uncomfortable corner in the room (on top of a sink space), propping my bottom
with a throw pillow to be able to sit for long stretches of time, and whenever
I went there to read, sleep had no chance of finding me. I also would sit on
the arms of the sofas in the reading rooms when I felt too comfortable on the
sofa.
Additionally,
when we were about a month to bar finals, and I realised that I could no longer
read in close proximity to my non-reading phone or any form of distraction, I
ensured that I never read in my room or anywhere remotely close to the phone.
So I would keep my phone in my room and head to the common room, which was a
bit of distance from my room so that my phone and social media could be out of
sight and out of mind.
Essentially, in NLS, I would recommend that you adapt to be able to read anywhere you can. However, if you have the chance to arrange your reading corner, ensure that it is comfortable (but not too comfortable; leave your bed as much as you can) and make sure that it is free from distractions.
SLEEP
On a
related note, this is going to be a very small segment, but I feel the need to
state that your success in NLS is not measured by how little you sleep during
the process. Now, I would be lying if I said that the rigours of NLS would not
require you to sacrifice sleep, but please, if you are burnt out from reading,
take a break. Take naps. If your head is aching, if you are no longer
comprehending what you are reading, if you are feeling sick while reading, it
might be a sign that you need to shut your books and sleep for a while.
Also,
know yourself and adapt your sleep schedule to what works best for you. I slept
for about 5 hours daily because I liked reading very early in the morning, but
I know someone who slept for 7 hours every night (because she could not
function otherwise) and still got a first class. I slept at night and read in
the mornings and afternoons, but I know first-class students who preferred to
sleep in the afternoon after lectures to wake up at night and read till
daybreak. Night reading is often viewed as the superior reading for some
reason, but the fact that I almost never read from the hours of 10pm to 3am in
the morning did not change the outcome I had at the end of NLS. In the end,
it's what's in your head and what you put down in the exam hall that matters,
not how little you slept or whether you never slept at night.
CONCLUSION
Now,
this is just a guideline on the best and most effective patterns of studying
for NLS. However, I feel the need to point out again that you should not get
caught up in reading/studying patterns that do not work for you just because
your friends, roommate, or whoever, are doing the same. Find what works for you
and maintain that system.
This
also goes into times and places that you choose to read. If you are a night
reader, read at night; if you can read during the day, do so; if you do not
like reading in the library, my friend, please don't go. You will not suddenly
become more serious because you went to the library to read. Once your reading
method involves more active recall, is effective and works well, there is no
need to change it. If the times you prefer to read are the times when you feel
alert, and your brain is the most optimised to remember, read during those
times. There is no 'one size fits all' approach to getting a first class at
NLS.
Next
up, we'll be looking at tackling the externship phase of NLS. Good luck!






